1C.0.2 Respectful Workplace

Responsible Position

Human Resources Officer

RELATED ITEMS

Minnesota State Board Policy

1B.1 Equal Opportunity and Nondiscrimination in Employment and Education

Minnesota State System Procedures

1C.0.2 Respectful Workplace

Minnesota State Law

Minnesota Management and Budget HR/LR Policy #1432

PROCEDURES

Purpose and Scope

To build and maintain a workplace that is objectively respectful and professional for all Alexandria Technical and Community College (ATCC) employees, volunteers, contractors, and other people interacting with or engaging with ATCC employees. This procedure applies to all college employees (including those online) and governs the interactions and communications of all ATCC employees involving other employees, students, or third parties.

General

ATCC is committed to providing an inclusive and respectful workplace as an important component of fulfilling the college’s vision and ability to carry out its mission. Accordingly, all employees of ATCC are expected to treat each other, members of the public, and others doing business with the college with professionalism and respect.

Definitions

Professionalism

Displaying the good judgment and proper behavior that is reasonably expected in the workplace.

Respect

Behavior or communication that demonstrates positive consideration and treats individuals in a manner that a reasonable person would find appropriate.

Third parties

Volunteers, contractors, and other non-employees in the workplace or in remote or virtual locations

Exclusions

This procedure addresses communications and behavior that do not involve protected class status. Communications and behavior that involve protected class status are addressed in ATCC Policy 1B.1. Student conduct will be evaluated according to the applicable Student Code of Conduct. Some complaints may allege conduct that involves ATCC Policy 1B.1, or other policies, and this procedure. Such alleged conduct may be examined and evaluated under the terms of this procedure by the same investigator and decision-making authority assigned to examine and evaluate the conduct under the terms of ATCC Policy 1B.1 and other policies.

Responsibilities

Expectations

Employees and third parties are expected to conduct themselves in a manner that demonstrates professionalism and respect for others in the workplace and in carrying out job duties, including in remote or virtual locations.

Examples of prohibited conduct include, but are not limited to:

Exhibiting aggressive behaviors including shouting, abusive language, direct or indirect threats of violence, or other non-verbal expressions of aggression;
Behavior that a reasonable person would find demeaning, humiliating, or bullying;
Deliberately destroying, damaging, or obstructing someone’s work performance, work product, tools, or materials; and/or
Using this procedure to knowingly make a false complaint.

In addition to their responsibilities as employees as described above, administrators, managers, and supervisors are also expected to:

Inform their employees and third parties for whom they are responsible of the expectations outlined in this procedure;
Behavior that a reasonable person would find demeaning, humiliating, or bullying;
Achieve and maintain compliance with this procedure; and
Take timely and appropriate action when a complaint is made alleging violation of this procedure.

In addition to these expectations, employees are encouraged to participate fully and in good faith in any informal resolution process or formal complaint and investigative process for which they may have relevant information. Employees are also encouraged to report incidents involving others that they observe and that may have violated this procedure in accordance with processes identified by ATCC.

Failure to comply with this procedure may result in disciplinary action in accordance with the applicable bargaining agreement or compensation plan, up to and including termination, or ending a contractor or volunteer relationship with ATCC.

Context
Context is important in understanding the difference between respectful and/or professional behavior and disrespectful and/or unprofessional behavior. Individuals may experience stress or discomfort in the workplace that is not related to disrespectful and/or unprofessional behavior. For example, disrespectful and/or unprofessional behavior does not include any of the following:

The normal exercise of administration, supervisory, or managerial responsibilities, including, but not limited to, performance reviews, work direction, performance management, and disciplinary action, provided they are conducted in a professional and respectful manner.
Disagreements, misunderstandings, miscommunication, or conflict situations where behavior remains professional and respectful.
Employee feedback and recommendations regarding peers where such feedback and recommendations are solicited by the employer are a routine part of the employee’s job duties, or where the right to make the recommendation is conferred by a collective bargaining agreement or compensation plan, provided that in all instances such feedback and recommendations are given in a professional and respectful manner.
Activity protected by the Public Employment Labor Relations Act.

Free speech and free inquiry

Not every act that may be viewed as lacking professionalism and respect violates this procedure. To violate this procedure, conduct must include action beyond the mere expression of views, words, symbols, or thoughts that another individual finds offensive. ATCC shall maintain and encourage full freedom, within the law, of inquiry, teaching, and research. Academic freedom comes with responsibility that all members of our education community benefit without intimidation, exploitation, or coercion. Workplace communications and conduct between co-workers will normally be subject to requirements in the expectations outlined above.

Retaliation Prohibited

Retaliation includes, but is not limited to, engaging in any form of intimidation, reprisal, or harassment. Retaliation is prohibited against any employee or third party who:

Initiates a complaint;
Reports an incident that may violate this procedure;
Participates in an investigation related to a complaint; or
Is associated or perceived to be associated with a person who initiates a complaint or participates in the investigation of a complaint under this procedure.

Procedures

As with all allegations of misconduct, resolution and investigatory processes related to this procedure will be conducted in a timely, fair, and objective manner. Individuals are encouraged to consider whether consulting with the college Human Resources office or the Employee Assistance Program (EAP) is likely to provide an opportunity for informal resolution and whether informal resolution makes sense in their particular situation. Represented employees may wish to consult with their exclusive representative.

Informal resolution
Employees and third parties are encouraged to speak with ATCC’s Human Resources office or with an Employee Assistance Program (EAP) representative for assistance or guidance on informal resolution.

The ATCC Human Resources office may adopt alternative dispute resolution approaches to facilitate voluntary informal resolution for respectful workplace complaints.

Formal complaints

Any employee or third party may initiate a formal complaint under this procedure. Complaints should be submitted to the Human Resources office at ATCC. If the complaint concerns a member of the Human Resources office, the complainant may contact the Chief Human Resources Officer or another appropriate administrator. If the complaint concerns the ATCC President, the complainant may contact the vice chancellor for Human Resources in the Minnesota State system office.

Complaints must contain details of the situation and the identity of the person or persons against whom the complaint is being made.
If an investigation is deemed warranted, a person against whom a formal complaint is made will be informed of the complaint.
The appropriate party in receipt of a complaint made pursuant to this procedure should acknowledge receipt of any complaint in writing, to the complainant, with a statement that would include:

The date that the complaint was made;
A statement that the Human Resources office or other appropriate manager or administrator retains the discretion to determine whether an investigation is warranted;
A statement that if it is determined that an investigation is warranted, all investigations will be conducted in a timely, fair, and objective manner; and
A statement that all recorded data associated with the complaint, including any investigation and any outcome, are government data, and that the release or non-release of data is governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (MGDPA).

The Human Resources office designee or other appropriate manager or administrator may, after an initial consideration of allegations in a complaint, determine that an investigation into all or some aspects of a complaint is not warranted for one or more of the following reasons:

The facts alleged, if taken as true, would not amount to a violation of this procedure;
The facts alleged are inherently implausible;
The facts alleged substantially repeat claims previously reviewed; or
Other sound reasons that further the fundamental purposes of this procedure.

Personnel actions taken in response to this complaint are subject to any processes under applicable bargaining agreements and plans, including review and/or appeal procedures. Any personnel actions taken in response to this complaint are government data. The release or non-release of this data is governed by the MGDPA.

ATCC may adopt alternative resolution and complaint procedures provided that such alternative procedures are consistent with the basic elements outlined above.

This process does not supersede any applicable grievance or dispute resolution process under a collective bargaining agreement or plan.

Browser version not supported

redirecting...

POLICIES & PROCEDURES